| ▲ | mypalmike 3 hours ago |
| Meanwhile the US is doubling down on fossil fuels because… reasons. |
|
| ▲ | thechao 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| I don't know about other states, but Texas has about 18GW of BESS, already (https://www.cleanview.co/power-projects/operating/battery-st...). We're planning another ~177GW (https://www.ercot.com/files/docs/2026/04/16/ERCOT-Monthly-Op...). |
|
| ▲ | kieranmaine 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| The BESS market is doing OK in the US. Politicians will come and go but the fundamentals of BESS are solid, so I don't see why the installed base won't keep increasing in the US. Battery storage capacity averaged 70% growth over the last three years - https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=67925 > During the first six months of 2026, operators added another 8.3 GW of battery storage capacity, reaching nearly 52 GW of nameplate battery storage capacity |
| |
| ▲ | ElevenLathe 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | What's a "GW of battery storage capacity"? Do they mean gigawatt-hour? (sidenote: how scary that the DoE is the one making this error?) | | |
| ▲ | thomastu 3 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | Depends on who you are talking to. Battery engineers tend to talk about capacity as storage potential (energy). The rest of the energy industry (resource planners, developers, manufacturers, etc.) talk about capacity in power terms (instantaneous discharge.) When you see people talking about Lithium-based chemistries, you'll often only see power terms because they are almost always for 2-hr projects. Nowadays you'll see more differentiation between 2-hr/4-hr/6-hr storage (and a few interesting companies doing 100-hr+). Unpacking the headline - A 600MW project of 4-hr lithium is 2.4GWh of storage capacity. The capacity rating of this project is 600MW, the storage capacity (2.4GWh) is an ESS specific attribute. Another important dimension to capacity is how much accredited capacity your project has. Usually projects are only given credit based on some set of historic averages of how much system load the asset actually serves (e.g. if you for some reason had a battery could only discharge at high noon every day, 200GW of this resource would in a sane world have an accredited capacity of near 0 because it's completely coincident with existing solar.) | |
| ▲ | kieranmaine an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | > What's a "GW of battery storage capacity"? This is the maximum amount of power it can dispatch. I think they use it intentionally so they can compare it to other generation sources. For example this spreadsheet [1], with data for 2023, contains figures for "power capacity megawatts" and "energy capacity megawatthours". 1. https://www.eia.gov/analysis/studies/electricity/batterystor... | | |
| |
| ▲ | wffurr 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | How much faster would it go if the feds were helping things along instead of actively hindering? | | |
| ▲ | pfdietz 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | The government likes to get in front of a parade and pretend they are leading it. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | Rebelgecko 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| YMMV depending on where in the US you are. California has like 10x'd it's battery storage in a couple years, to the point where it's the main source of electricity during some time slots where we used to be dependent on natty gas. Edit: although it looks like in recent days, fossil fuels reign supreme once the sun goes down. I guess we don't have enough batteries for the current heat wave |
| |
|
| ▲ | iknowstuff 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| We have one of the world's largest BESS installations in California. Calm down. |
|
| ▲ | burnte 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Not really. The market is still moving quickly towards renewables. It's only some conservative politicians in the US that are making noise about fossil fuels, not the market. |
| |
| ▲ | smallerize 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | The market does not fix the administration paying wind projects billions of dollars to stop development. The market does not fix the administration forcing coal plants to stay open even when they are losing money. The market does not fix the administration cancelling grants for clean energy projects and subsidies for electric cars, and adding tariffs to solar panel imports. And US car manufacturers are enthusiastically moving away from their efficiency goals. That market is not moving quickly to renewables. | | |
| ▲ | Schiendelman an hour ago | parent [-] | | Paying a wind company billions of dollars in damages is basically a wash, they spend that on another installation. |
|
|