> I don't even see salary or what your debt is as "personal information" (am Swede not in Sweden), personal information is stuff that no one else would need to know. What people earn affects not just people around you and others in the workplace but also society at large, makes a ton of sense for that stuff to be public.

In a high trust culture I get this. But what about if you're in a low trust culture with quite some "not so orderly behavior" (if you will).

▲

ninalanyon 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Perhaps one of the steps to a high trust culture is actually trusting people.

▲

MentalM 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> In a high trust culture I get this.

Wait, aren't Sweden like literally the world leader by rapes count?

	▲	etiennebausson 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Declared or actual? There is a huge difference in most countries. Sweden may well be one of the few countries where being raped isn't shameful/your fault for dressing too lightly/punishable by death.

▲

embedding-shape 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I think it's the opposite, the mismatch of information availability between employer and employee makes that a low trust culture, which is addressed by making that information public instead. If it was a high trust culture, employees would trust their employer pay them fairly, but they don't, hence this information deserves to be public.