The next frontier is to maintain 'limited privacy'.

That's denying most culprits the opportunity to use the collected data against you.

Like always on VPN, turning off personalization, ad guards and using open source products where possible.

arethuza 8 hours ago | parent | next [-]

It's a bit like physical security of your house - could someone break into my house, not easily but it's a house not a bank vault. Keeping our gate closed and having a large dog (who is actually very friendly) about the place probably keeps the vast majority of possible thieves away.

▲

TeMPOraL 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

That's still a bit on the obsessive side. The reasonable position is the same as it always has been in the real world too:

- Don't volunteer your intimate details left and right;

- Feel entitled to deny requests for unnecessary data (and advocate for such rights if you're in position to)

- Otherwise don't sweat it, because you can't actually control what others know about you, you never could

	▲	deltoidmaximus an hour ago \| parent \| next [-]
		The trouble with this is the baseline is getting to high. You've got age verification coming, google rolling out phone verification for websites, etc. Once that is rolled out, accepted and "easy" it will be used for everything important "for security" and then everything not important because hey, you were doing anyway? The reasonable position will be slow marched into hell same as the rest of them, just a few steps behind.
	▲	az09mugen 7 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		I feel like this is the best compromise. Thanks for wording it.