S3 is too expensive to do a restore from. And you have to restore to verify.

mrweasel 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Depending on the amount of data you have, might it not be less expensive than build the tape drive?

An LTO drive is easily $10.000. You can restore a lot of S3 data for that amount of money. Sadly getting cheaper tape options is not really possible anymore.

▲

sdcfgy 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I paid < $400 for my LTO5

▲

mrweasel an hour ago | parent [-]

I assume used. Sadly I'm not really in a market where that type of equipment is widely available second hand.

	▲	sdcfgy an hour ago \| parent [-]
		Yeah used with 1 year warranty. Ah that sucks :(

▲

Joel_Mckay an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

>Depending on the amount of data you have, might it not be less expensive than build the tape drive?

Rule #25: Try to avoid making what one may purchase, as the total cost is often many times higher than first assumed.

It is tempting for many, but often doesn't end well for businesses. =3

▲

nxobject 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It isn't too expensive for my use case – per month, I retrieve about 500GB a month from Glacier Instant Retrieval to verify, which costs ~$15. Combined with other costs, my monthly bill is ~$50.

I used to use Backblaze B2, which had cheaper egress at the cost of slightly more expensive storage (I think ~$5/TB/mo, with free egress up to 3x all current storage?) So I paid $20. But at some point AWS opened a datacenter near me, and I couldn't ignore how much faster data transfers got.

	▲	sdcfgy 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		It's ok when it's 0.5TB but we're at about 900TB. The point is the cost doesn't scale well.

▲

smw 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

use cloudflare's r2, no egress fees