Google considers pretty much everything in hwops to be a trade secret. The point is to keep the specifics unknown as much as possible from competitors; the public at large's knowledge is just collateral damage in that fight.

▲

thayne 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

What benefit could competitors get from that information?

	▲	bryan_w an hour ago \| parent \| next [-]
		It doesn't even have to be competitors their suppliers would love to know the total amount of widgets that they'll be buying. That way they know if they're the single supplier
	▲	esafak 2 hours ago \| parent \| prev \| next [-]
		The ability to improve their data centers, of course. Google is the company that launched data centers with commodity components.
	▲	shadowgovt an hour ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		It tells them exactly how much they have to invest in hardware buildout to stay competitive with Google in terms of raw compute. This is right up there with being able to predict a competitor's total manufacturing capacity for the next year because you have hard numbers on their raw material purchase.

▲

shadowgovt 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

And this one in particular is a high-ticket trade secret; it has been for decades, long before the AI push.

Power and water consumption number revelation goes directly to ceiling on maximum compute and relative compute efficiency. It's handing to every competitor on the planet (including China) "Hey, here's the raw situation on how far along we are on our total capacity to do anything."

... whether this should be a trade secret (since power and water are both shared resources with the surrounding community) is a reasonable question, but in the ecosystem where it is, Google having this data public and their competitors not is a problem.

▲

dietr1ch 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

If they are so good at it, they should push to make that the bare minimum and get to hold all future datacenter permits.