One should be careful with vibe-written / vibe-aided articles here. Who knows what is actually supported vs what sounded okay and the author (who is not a clinician) then signed off on.

Even the core idea, 'rejection sensitivity' is acknowledged not to be a diagnostic entity: so then how can we make definitive comparisons? Maybe clinical gestalt... but the author is not trained to see and evalaute patients.

▲

mobilejdral an hour ago | parent | next [-]

100%, you can't have a section titled

> Why It Happens: The Mechanics Underneath the Reaction

And then don't talk about Mechanics, but instead no citations just guess. For anyone that actually wants something to go learn more about checkout the frequency of NCAH and the resulting blunted cortisol response as one thing that is influencing this.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s42003-024-06102-y#MOESM3 Plasmalogen, B5, 12-HETE, Androsterone sulfate, etc are all related to the functioning of the HPA-Axis.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19598235/ <- CYP11B1 specifically here

Anecdotally: I worked at a software company that had free snacks in the office kitchen and would always chuckle how the salt snacks would run out first. The connection being NCAH can result in less aldosterone which helps regulate salt in the body.

	▲	RobotToaster a few seconds ago \| parent [-]
		Interesting. Intuitively a software company is the last place I would expect a high concentration of people with a condition that causes high testosterone.

▲

adamsb6 an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Is this all that unusual for the field of education research?

Vibe writing may be an improvement. I doubt frontier models would go along with whole language reading instruction without a tremendous amount of pushback.

For those not in the know, a generation of children were taught to read sans phonics. They were told to do things like guess at words based on pictures or context clues. Some lessons had teachers covering words up and asking kids to use guessing strategies at what they might be.

	▲	CrazyStat 18 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		[dead]

▲

alephnerd 42 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> One should be careful with vibe-written / vibe-aided articles here. Who knows what is actually supported vs what sounded okay and the author (who is not a clinician) then signed off on.

The poster is SEOing their substack and product (modulo). All their posts are either related to their product, their product's substack, or talks related to their product.

HN has been an SEO and content marketing target for years now, and existing HN moderation is increasingly failing to catch these attempts.

Heck, a bot account for The Register reached 66K karma and was undetected until a couple of us complained.

▲

RobotToaster 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Rejection sensitivity dysphoria is an acknowledged trait of ADHD.

▲

bonsai_spool 9 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

I can't respond to your newest comment but essentially 'rejection sensitivity dysphoria' is not in the DSM-V, so to acknowledge it one needs to have both a definition and some reasonable experience with the diagnostic entity (i.e., it's not enough to read about a disease to be able to diagnose it).

▲

giantg2 an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

That doesn't invalidate the parent's point. We can still question if the details and way it is presented is accurate.

	▲	RobotToaster 11 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		I should've been clearer, I was replying to the "so then how can we make definitive comparisons" point.