So if you use more electricity next month the CEO of the electric company should be put in jail?

I understand this is snark, but if you think about it, this is already implemented in electrical infrastructure. If I use too much power, the circuit breaker trips to protect me and protect the electrical grid. OP is about a billing breaker, but the parallels should be obvious.

If the CEO of the electric company didn't mandate circuit breakers, he should go to jail.

▲

lorecoeur 6 hours ago | parent [-]

The breaker in this analogy is equivalent to rate quota limits, it limits peak throughput.

You can rack up an outrageous monthly electricity bill without tripping a breaker.

	▲	josephcsible 6 hours ago \| parent [-]
		The peak throughput does result in an overall monthly limit though. For a house with a 200A main breaker, that effectively limits your electric bill to $7,000/month, which is very reasonable compared to the tens of thousands of dollars in a single day that a lot of cloud billing disasters end up costing.

▲

genxy 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Analogies are not the core of your cognition.

▲

popalchemist 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Utilities required for basic survival are expected to remain on for obvious reasons. Like not letting people die.

	▲	6 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		[deleted]
	▲	7 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		[deleted]