| ▲ | Barrin92 2 hours ago | |
terrorists can also use annas archive, scihub and equipment they order on Alibaba to build bioweapons and I don't see him losing his mind over those if you're trying to build a bioweapon shockingly enough the bottleneck is... the laboratory work. What on earth is 'legit' about stringing words together that sound scary, you can't just iterate 'ai bioweapon cyber' in a sentence over and over as if that adds up to actual evidence for an increased risk of any threat. well tbf you can technically because apparently it freaks a lot of podcast listeners out | ||
| ▲ | jswelker 26 minutes ago | parent [-] | |
As a thought experiment imagine you have a biochemical PhD expert on the phone with you giving you step by step instructions on how to grow some dangerous biotoxin, giving you feedback in real time and helping you troubleshoot. Would you be more successful with this expert than you'd be on your own? Now imagine anyone can call that expert for free at any time. Maybe the AI isn't quite there with biology knowledge yet (doubtful), but it is a matter of time. How is that not a real risk? | ||