If someone set up their own camera and analytics platform outside of politicians and police officers homes and places of work, they would be taken down the next day. It's clearly biased towards people they see as not being able to fight back.

▲

akerl_ 3 hours ago | parent [-]

Aren't politicians pretty routinely followed by people with cameras doing analysis on all their movements?

Sure, if you strapped a camera to a light post without permission, I'd expect it to be taken down. The same way I can put a Ring camera on my door but I can't strap one to the traffic sign on my street.

▲

__MatrixMan__ 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I didn't give flock permission to put cameras all over my traffic infrastructure. Admittedly it jointly belongs to other taxpayers, but I don't think they gave that permission either. So as you say, they should expect them to be taken down. And from what I've been seeing around town, that's exactly what is happening to them. I wonder how long it will take Flock to stop putting them back up.

▲

akerl_ 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Flock didn’t just yolo decide to slap cameras up. Your elected officials signed contracts to let them.

	▲	__MatrixMan__ an hour ago \| parent [-]
		Perhaps, but that was overreach on their part.

▲

kennywinker 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

> The same way I can put a Ring camera on my door

If your door films the street, this is something that should be considered an invasion of your neighbour's privacy. The fact that it isn't is... disappointing.

Especially given the networked nature of those cameras. The police can access them by asking amazon permission, they don't need to ask you. Are you comfortable with that? I am not.