| ▲ | Betelbuddy an hour ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
>> It’s a really good model. In the meantime, I have cancelled my Anthropic subscription... I have a simple test that I have been running iteratively across the SOTA models from several vendors, including one Chinese vendor. I start with some code produced by an Anthropic SOTA model...let’s call that Code A. Then I get Code B and Code C for the same task from models by two other vendors. Then I ask each model to review and critique the other proposals. By the end, both the Anthropic model and I usually run out of arguments... against them and agree that proposals B and C are better. Claude then always asks whether it can incorporate the code or ideas from B and C into its own solution... | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | karp773 an hour ago | parent [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
It's not even funny any more. Chinese model, Chinese vendor, Chinese, Chinese... Did I say Chinese? Chinese! Nobody in his right mind will use a Chinese clone when you have models like Opus 5.5 for peanuts. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||