> AI can create some efficiencies, but it almost certainly solves fewer healthcare or education problems than most AI maximalists believe.

Do you have any information to back this claim up?

He doesn't need to have it, because his comment is carefully crafted to not say anything other than signaling anti-AI sentiment.

Of course AI "almost certainly" solves fewer problems than the people that think AI can solve all the problems think. That doesn't mean anything. Also notice how he puts together "AI didn't help" and "AI caused harm", and then says that's the most common experience.

The claims of said maximalists are extraordinary and thus require extraordinary evidence.

Dismissing them otoh does not.

Vibes. All headlines and vibes.