It is not the same, especially when the agent is running a task for the lab. Anyway, what I'm proposing are new laws that establish this.

▲

YetAnotherNick 18 hours ago | parent [-]

Huggingface incident was different in that there was no one else to point the blame to. That's why OpenAI apologised, provided data to independent researchers, worked with huggingface etc.

The case will be lot more complicated if someone uses Kimi to hack into a site. Should the person giving agent the command responsible or the CEO of kimi.

▲

asadotzler 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Because apologizing gets us all off the hook for computer crimes, right? When I hack my bank, if I get caught I'll just apologize and that'll make everything okay. Sure thing.

▲

gyt2 17 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Kimi CEO obviously.

The reality is they have to reduce the capability to ensure security. If someone wants more? Then use the product with your identity and face scan at each session.

Trade offs mate.

	▲	YetAnotherNick 6 hours ago \| parent [-]
		So you want Kimi to follow US law? If Saudi makes it illegal for llm to say something like being gay is normal, should they also catch Kimi CEO or other employees they could?