Have you tried the model itself and seen if it's "even slightly competitive" or not, and have specific complaints about it? Otherwise it feels like you're complaining about something that is easy to test but rather than taking the time to actually figuring that out first, you're arguing about some general and theoretical thing which the submission (may) directly disprove.

▲

petesergeant 5 hours ago | parent [-]

No, I haven’t, but I’ll donate $20 to the non-political charity of your choice if it doesn’t turn out to sit a significant difference from the frontier.

I think it’s a safe assumption that they’re leaning into “sovereign” because performance is bad.

	▲	ygjb 5 hours ago \| parent [-]
		I think you have it backwards. Sovereign is the goal, good can come later. There is a proliferation of sovereign models under development specifically to address data sovereignty, and a loss of performance is absolutely acceptable over the risk that a once ally will turn adversarial, or a foreign business stops serving what has become critical infrastructure.