|
| ▲ | agos 17 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| One of the reasons why it was noti considered a barrier was the ability to purchase a single issue for a very reasonable price (or even read somebody else’s copy or the copy made available by the bar) vs being asked to subscribe |
| |
| ▲ | jameshart 16 hours ago | parent [-] | | I shared a gift link here. You could go to your local library and look it up. What's the complaint here? | | |
| ▲ | simoncion 17 minutes ago | parent [-] | | I'm not OP, but a big part of the complaint is that one can't pay 10USD to read the issue that contains the article in question... absent the charity of someone else, one must pay -at minimum- nine times that amount. [0] Ten bucks is pretty close to "I don't even need to think about it" money. Ninety is -for most folks- nowhere near that. [0] <https://accounts.theatlantic.com/products> |
|
|
|
| ▲ | Lerc 11 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Publishing in a newspaper gets you distribution and a permanent record. After one day access was also virtually free. Going behind a paywall is a reduced distribution over what an individual can easily access, and the content is no longer permanent but subject to whatever the publisher chooses to keep providing. |
| |
| ▲ | jameshart 10 hours ago | parent [-] | | It’s in The Atlantic. There’ll be a copy in the Library of Congress. You’ll be able to read it for free in any dentist’s waiting room for the next six months. | | |
| ▲ | 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | [deleted] | |
| ▲ | simoncion 11 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | > You’ll be able to read it for free in any dentist’s waiting room... Methinks that this says quite a lot about your socioeconomic situation. I've not seen The Atlantic in a dentist's waiting room. |
|
|