Remix.run Logo
▲ expedited123 3 hours ago

I'm always amazed how entitled people are these days for free stuff. That being said, it does show costs are piling up for these AI companies if even Google is restricting free access to a relatively smaller model amid the AI hype train. Good!

▲nairboon 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

The entitled consumer is just a symptom of large scale anti competitive practices. It's classic price dumping by the oligopolists. It's so pervasive that consumer get used to these super low prices (free).

▲gonzalohm 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

What do you mean entitled? It's Google the one trying to shove AI into all their products.

What should be illegal is to try to get customers by letting it use for free or at a low price and the jack up prices

▲preommr 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> show costs are piling up for these AI companies

OpenAI cancelling the $200/20x and then introducing the $500/25x was basically the canary in the coal mine.

I am looking forward to the 2026 numbers from Anthropic in preperation for their IPO, because that's where the really big numbers are going to be.

▲dgellow an hour ago | parent [-]

The original „AI labs are bleeding money“ canary is dead since a very long time at this point

▲glimshe 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Years of low interest rates fueled by monetary manipulation created the free economy. This is no longer sustainable when creditors demands interest rates better aligned with historical norms.

I've always hated "free" because it sucks the oxygen away from good ideas and redirects money to people who have the connections to get zero risk loans (with no responsibility to pay the principal if things go bad).

▲jbs789 an hour ago | parent [-]

I like that framing.

Over the past ~20 years we have benefited from VCs valuing growth and distant payoffs, in part because discount rates were low. Now investors have a preference for nearer term profitability (higher discount rates), thus prices are increasing.

▲Gigioingiro 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It's not that we are entitled to free stuff, but if you have access to models that are incredibly cheaper than Gemini and arguably more performative, it's very reasonable to point out that Google can afford to raise the prices thanks solely to the enormous scale and distribution power, specially with B2B market that rejects Chinese models.

▲simianwords 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

If consumers are required to pay: nooo i want free stuff

If the free stuff is subsidised by ads: noo advertisements are bad!!