| ▲ | clintonb 5 hours ago | |
Ink is cheaper. | ||
| ▲ | qayxc 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
I've worked in wholesale logistics (backend for inventory management) for many years way back when and let me tell you, cost of ink vs cost of a chip the least of the problems. Barcodes (and QR codes as used here) have two major flaws: reading them is challenging (works fine if the package is undamaged and you TRUST that it contains what it says on the box) and they're still just a number. RFID can help with both these issues and the savings from that can outweigh the additional cost by a lot. Utility is key and RFID has a lot of advantages over bar codes (and QR codes). | ||
| ▲ | bnegreve 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
Not if you include the cost of the employee scanning the bar codes. Even if the customers does it, it still takes a lot more time and space than scanning a basket full of RFIDs labels. It literally takes seconds. | ||