Strange in what way? Mitchell has also stated that he reviews every line of code that goes into Ghostty so I don't think its quite the same as the Bun rewrite.

▲

brabel 17 hours ago | parent [-]

He can say that … but after reviewing the 1000th PR from a LLM and only finding minor issues that really go down to subjective taste, I think he may start to reconsider that.

▲

surgical_fire 16 hours ago | parent [-]

One day I may get there, but even for minor PRs I constantly find important issues that I need to intervene.

▲

brabel 9 hours ago | parent [-]

Really, even after a LLM has gone through a review and fixed issues found? I almost never see anything relevant since around Opus 5 came out, and now with Fable and Opus 5.5 whatever I think is wrong is almost certainly right.

	▲	surgical_fire 8 hours ago \| parent [-]
		On my small personal projects I seldom find any mistakes. I use Chinese models on those. GLM, DeepSeek, MiMo. At work I use Claude, but it is a considerably larger and quite complex codebase. I use LLMs a lot, but it is a common weekly occurrence for me to correct misconceptions, bugs, or overengineering from Opus/Sonnet (Opus plans and reviews, Sonnet implements).