If it's generating detectably incorrect code, why do you need an LLM to tell you it's a bug?

onlyrealcuzzo an hour ago | parent | next [-]

Encountering something that seems incorrect, and proving something is a bug and not just YOUR user error, AND reproducing it minimally - turns out to not be easy when it's a low-level compiler issue, and YOU'RE not an expert, especially when it relates to Dwarf tables...

Typically, any time you think you've found a compiler error, you're using it wrong...

	▲	nvme0n1p1 44 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		If it's a real bug, you can just report what you know and leave it at that. You don't need to embellish it with random guesses about a root cause. Okay: "I compile this input and the linker crashes." Not okay: "I compile this input and the linker crashes. Also here's 10 paragraphs of slop about dwarf tables, which I can't even evaluate the accuracy of since I'm not an expert." > Typically, any time you think you've found a compiler error, you're using it wrong... Yes, if you can't figure out if it's a bug, the bug tracker is the wrong place to get help. Ask in a community forum instead.

▲

an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

[deleted]