| ▲ | unclad5968 an hour ago |
| It's a violation of project rules to confirm bugs with AI? |
|
| ▲ | bendmorris an hour ago | parent | next [-] |
| Read it yourself: https://ziglang.org/code-of-conduct/ |
| |
| ▲ | sigmar an hour ago | parent [-] | | >If you use a chatbot to give you advice on a comment on the issue tracker, that comment is unwelcome. >No LLMs for finding bugs. >No talking about use of chatbot/LLM services. I've said it before and I'll say it again- it's a cult that bans dissent | | |
| ▲ | tolerance 9 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | > The Zig community is decentralized. Anyone is free to start and maintain their own community, which is not subject to these rules. | |
| ▲ | alexrp 42 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | For the record, there isn't even uniformity of thought on LLMs within the core team, let alone the broader Zig community. | | |
| ▲ | sigmar 35 minutes ago | parent [-] | | If there's an edict that no one is allowed to bring up the topic, how can someone change this part of the code of conduct? Asking non-rhetorically. It seems like one position "ai in any circumstance = bad" is being enforced. The commenter above didn't even understand why he was ignored. | | |
| ▲ | alexrp 3 minutes ago | parent [-] | | > If there's an edict that no one is allowed to bring up the topic, how can someone change this part of the code of conduct? To clarify, do you mean someone who isn't part of the core team? |
|
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | cabaalis 7 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| "NO LLMs for finding bugs" is easier written as "Don't use the tools your adversaries will" I've written code a long time and that's probably the dumbest rule I've seen. |
|
| ▲ | jibalt an hour ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Yes ... pretty damn stupid. |
