| ▲ | F3nd0 3 hours ago |
| I assume it runs deeper, but that doesn’t feel all that foreign compared to the US, does it? |
|
| ▲ | boc 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| There's nothing like that in the US, not by any measure. The whole reason you have entrepreneurs in the US is because people DON'T judge for you failing. You can always start again. |
| |
| ▲ | jimbob45 an hour ago | parent [-] | | Pretty sure we judged the heck out of Juicero, Theranos, and WeWork on this very website. | | |
| ▲ | blast an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | Not simply for failing though. Obviously there were other factors. | |
| ▲ | chihuahua an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | Right, but Elizabeth Holmes already has investors lined up for her next attempt to revolutionize medical testing. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | zeusdclxvi 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| I don't know, I think it does, US social media is rather shameless, there's certainly no national social credit score or anything |
| |
| ▲ | F3nd0 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | Fair enough, but are we talking credit score or shaming by other users/citizen? Shaming and bullying people who are perceived as having done something wrong on-line is not unheard of in ‘the west’. I suppose it concerns famous people far more than your ordinary social circles, though. |
|