Remix.run Logo
▲ ChrisMarshallNY 3 hours ago

Yeah...everyone wants access to the Apple ecosystem market, because...

...anyone?

...Bueller?

Apple customers are a very lucrative demographic.

People that sell Apple apps, stand to make a lot of money; even if they have to pay 15% (unless they make over a mill).

But the reason that all those Apple customers love Apple (and they do; even if HN participants don't), is because of that walled garden and restrictive policy stuff.

So, if we destroy that, we are likely to also destroy the reason that so many people want access to the Apple ecosystem.

It's very much human nature, at work, here.

<img href="/person_sawing_off_branch_hes_sitting_on.png" />

▲stale2002 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> So, if we destroy that

Nobody has to destroy anything. If you want to keep using your Apple Approval Stamped stuff, nobody wants to stop you from doing that on your own.

Instead, people are saying that other people should be free to do what they want with their devices that they own. Thats all. Keep your Apple Safe Mode On devices, just stop trying to sabotage other people's attempts to choose otherwise.

▲ChrisMarshallNY 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Sure, but what people want, and they say it, in the comments above, is access to Apple customers.

That's different from "doing what I want on my own device."

▲bigyabai 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

> So, if we destroy that, we are likely to also destroy the reason that so many people want access to the Apple ecosystem.

By this same logic, United States v. Microsoft Corp. should be overturned instantaneously. Microsoft Windows was the most popular operating system in the world, and the court forced Microsoft to take actions that the majority of Windows users did not agree to when they bought their PC. By reaching in and micromanaging Microsoft's ecosystem, the US destroyed the reason that users trusted Microsoft's operating system over their competitors.

What makes iOS customers special, that their ecosystem can't be destroyed while Microsoft's can? Both are accruing market damages.

▲ChrisMarshallNY 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

They have a lot of money, compared to more budget-conscious customers, and they are used to paying more.

Makes for an attractive customer base. I know that there have been a number of studies, that found Apple apps make a great deal more money, per app, than Android ones (I'm sure there are special outliers in both camps, though).

I make free apps. In my case, it has nothing to do with "snobbery." I've just been doing it for most of my adult life, so I'm invested in the platform, like many of us do.

I also enjoy working in a challenging environment. I've learned to adapt.

▲bigyabai 10 minutes ago | parent [-]

So, again, why is this distinctive from the natural monopoly that Microsoft attained and illegally abused to restrict competitors from having equal access to their platform?

▲NamlchakKhandro 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Snobbery.