Remix.run Logo
▲ applfanboysbgon 3 hours ago

[flagged]

▲dang 3 hours ago | parent [-]

Can you please not break the site guidelines like this, regardless of how wrong someone is or you feel they are? I realize it's frustrating—most of all when someone is lazily expressing a one-sided majority view (<-- not talking about the GP here, just in general), but it's necessary to wait until that surge of frustration subsides before posting, if we're to have the kind of discussion we're trying for (https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html).

If you know more than someone else does, that's great—but in that case please share some of what you know, so we can all learn, and please do it without resorting to putdowns or swipes.

I know that takes more time and energy, but in this way you make an enduring positive contribution instead of an ephemeral destructive one. Curious conversation is fragile; it can't withstand many kicks and blows.

https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&sor...

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

▲applfanboysbgon 3 hours ago | parent [-]

What exactly is a productive response to blatant racism other than calling it out? What constructive discussion does a variant of "all Asian people look the same" engender?

▲dang 3 hours ago | parent [-]

A productive response would be one that doesn't, if repeated, lead to the destruction of the commons (https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=false&qu...).

The issue is the kind of community we're trying to have here. In deciding what counts as a good contribution, that has to be the high order bit.

At a minimum, one thing that requires is not punishing people for being wrong. We're all wrong, after all.

▲applfanboysbgon 2 hours ago | parent [-]

I would argue that shunning racism is productive for the commons. Instead it is the person calling it out who is being shunned. Wonderful.

The claim being made is so obviously, categorically incorrect that it falls apart within a single second of examination. For example: Hoyoverse, a Chinese company, produced Genshin Impact and Nodusfall, two games with completely different art styles. And yet, in typing this, I have already spent an order of magnitude more effort[1] than somebody professing their racist worldview is dignified to receive. I think the actual productive response is shutting that down. I mean, really. A billion people who can only produce one artstyle like a factory? The claim is so patently, obviously, intentionally racist and incapable of holding up to reality it's absurd.

I could spend an hour scrolling back through my Twitter likes and collecting links to a huge array of Chinese artists with divergent artstyles, but in doing so I would be doing nothing more than wasting my own time, because someone with such a flagrant disregard of reality to come to that conclusion in the first place isn't going to change their view based on being shown reality.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brandolini%27s_law

Whatever. I unfortunately have a compulsion to check this site, but I'll do my best to refrain from posting in the future, since your vision of the site is one where posting racist comments is welcome and calling them out is unwelcome.

▲F3nd0 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> Hoyoverse, a Chinese company, produced Genshin Impact and Nodusfall, two games with completely different art styles.

And with that single sentence, you have provided a great counter-example. Had you included it in your first comment, you would have saved yourself yet another order of magnitude’s worth of words to type out and contributed to the culture here far more, no?

For what it’s worth, the original comment did not read as blatantly racist to me, though I see how one could read it that way.

▲ 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]
[deleted]