Cool, we will finally have actual data to see if that’s possible or not. My understanding is that doing compute in space for ML is pretty absurd, but the discussion will be way more interesting with real numbers.

I still think it’s mostly a way to put pressure on politicians, « you either give us tax cut, fast tracked permits, and let us do what we want with the land or we go to space and you get no benefits »

▲

d_silin 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Doing compute in space for ML is perfectly possible (i.e. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phi-Sat-2), making it competitive with terrestrial compute is a much harder question to solve.

▲

boplicity 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

What makes you think governments can't or won't regulate organizations operating in space?

▲

lp92 3 hours ago | parent [-]

The fact that SpaceX + Starlink exists and wasn't regulated in to oblivion shows the US government will mostly stay away.

	▲	wongarsu 3 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Starlink is heavily regulated. Or at least as heavily as anyone else using radio spectrum Not sure what interest the government would have in stricter regulation of the rocket launching side of SpaceX. Environmental impact and impact on air traffic and boats is regulated. And SpaceX existing is strongly benefiting the US government. They are their biggest customer
	▲	JacobAsmuth 3 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Is it possible that our current government is particularly prone to under regulation of Elon Musks companies and that a different administration may in fact behave differently?