This requires a lot of extra work though, and extra work is downward pressure on the behavior (underage people looking at pornography) that the state of Utah is trying to exert downward pressure on.

The inability to immediately and perfectly eliminate a behavior is not a good enough reason to be against any attempt to eliminate that behavior.

▲

Rohansi 4 hours ago | parent [-]

> The inability to immediately and perfectly eliminate a behavior is not a good enough reason to be against any attempt to eliminate that behavior.

So if you are legally required to block all VPN users and then fail to actually block all VPN users what is stopping you from being punished for not complying with the law?

	▲	fc417fc802 an hour ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Common sense on the part of the judge presumably. Best effort and common practice will enter into it. Lots of regulation is like that.
	▲	mahboi 4 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Yeah, that's the problem. But if they changed the law to not require all users to be blocked, it'd still have the outcome they want.