| ▲ | cvburgess 7 hours ago | |
Considering they were your top two models, how did the flash and non-flash versions compare? Did you use them for different tasks? | ||
| ▲ | RussianCow 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
Not OP, but I've used both quite a bit and I think GLM 5.3 (non-flash) is a vastly better model. The flash variant is good for general workhorse agents, but it doesn't seem to reason holistically about code and over-engineers solutions to each specific problem it solves. But if you use GLM 5.3 to write a detailed plan with little to no ambiguity, GLM 5.3 Flash executes it just fine for a fraction of the price. | ||
| ▲ | ThibWeb 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
I have a hard time justifying GLM 5.3 these days. It’s slightly better than Flash but rarely enough to justify the much steeper price. We chose to use usage-based billing only so are very sensitive to model price. | ||
| ▲ | gunalx 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
When text wuality or for pure but adwansed coding is concerned i always pick glm 5.3. The flash is awesome for everything that dosent really matter though. | ||