Is the information actually wrong, misleading, or otherwise deficient?

Idk but I’m not wasting my time checking all that. Feel free to give us a detailed line by line analysis of what’s misleading/deficient.

The reason for my comment is that we, the readers, are most likely gonna spend more time reading this post than the author(s) did writing it.

Thanks for the heads up, looks like this is a case of AI;DR (maybe I should get some bumper stickers printed).

	▲	gerdesj an hour ago \| parent [-]
		It clearly is AI generated but the ideas as presented are mostly sound. However, it is woefully incomplete.