I agree. I don't necessarily "trust" Anthropic and OpenAI when it comes to CC/Codex respectively, but I respect that they have immense internal resources and telemetry to be able to understand what features move the needle and nudge traces in the right direction. I don't understand how non-labs judge feature inclusion? Just vibes?

What makes you think that labs don't operate on "vibes"?

If there's anything that I can conclude about Anthropics idea of how a LLM should speak. Vibes would have been an euphemism