I'm not seeing what you're seeing. The inactivity reboot wouldn't be a problem if they aren't waiting for a warrant. The fact that this article even exists supports the fact that they are waiting for warrants.

Also, as someone who was the victim of a pretty awful violent crime I'm here to tell you that police are not the enemy. There are some really bad people out there, trust me.. if you ever met one you would probably be okay with cops violating their privacy.

▲

writtenone 35 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

There's no world in which cops can or will only violate the privacy of obvious criminals.

It becomes "well we need to scan websites to make sure there's no X, Y, or Z, and prosecute the site operators who don't cooperate" real fast.

▲

32 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

[deleted]

▲

whatsdowndog an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

>> police are not the enemy

You are on the wrong website buddy. The group think here doesn't like statements like these.

	▲	jmward01 36 minutes ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Most police aren't the enemy. Unfortunately it only takes a few that are or one that is having a bad day. Black and white distinctions 'they are all good' or 'they are all bad', are a core problem. Recognizing that we need to hold police accountable and limit their authority and actions isn't saying police are bad, it is proper and necessary oversight and is what is best for citizens and police.
	▲	toomuchtodo 7 minutes ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Help yourself to the long list of "people with a monopoly on force and who cannot be trusted." https://www.prisonpolicy.org/blog/2026/01/26/police_miscondu... https://www.prisonpolicy.org/blog/2020/06/05/policekillings/ https://www.policedatainitiative.org/datasets/ https://policecrime.bgsu.edu/Home/Crimes https://ij.org/the-ij-database-of-alpr-abuse/ https://ndi.iadlest.org/home "And some, I assume, are good people."

▲

sixothree an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

Dahmer's victim would like to have a word with you.