| ▲ | blochist 2 hours ago | |
This is untrue and if you thought about what you're claiming for a second this should be obvious. The MIT license let's someone do any of the things outlined there subject only to the need to retain the copyright notice and the license itself. I can grab MIT-licensed files and commit them to my repo (e.g., vendoring a dependency). I can also grab the files from an MIT-licensed commit and then the files from the next commit and recreate the history of that repo with myself as the author provided I've met those two conditions. I'm not saying this isn't _scummy_ behavior; it is! But its within the bounds of what the MIT license allows. | ||
| ▲ | jpc0 an hour ago | parent [-] | |
MIT does not wave the right to attribution so no even under MIT it is illegal to reattribue work. Authorship and the underlying code are seperate rights under law. | ||