| ▲ | raincole 2 hours ago |
| > The number of warrantless device searches at the border and the significant invasion of privacy they represent is only increasing. In Fiscal Year 2022, CBP conducted an all-time high of 45,499 device searches. https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2023/05/federal-judge-makes-hi... But sure it's the current administration what pushed this so far beyond. Beyond 40k phones into 50k phones! |
|
| ▲ | adhadion an hour ago | parent | next [-] |
| I really doubt the previous administration was trying to deprive people of their liberty based on their political beliefs. The current administration very clearly is. I can't speak to any changes in the phone search policy, but your right to freedom of expression is gone at the federal level. https://www.propublica.org/article/caught-in-crackdown-ice-c... |
| |
| ▲ | user_7832 an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | Both things are simultaneously possible:
* This admin is actively hostile in a specific way (eg towards immigrants)
* All govts have been hostile for a (very) hot minute (see: patriot act, snowden stuff that happened across different presidents). And a bonus:
* This is not a new thing, a is related to why people occasionally talk about "the swamp"/the "deep state"/"3 letter agencies". NSA has self interest to stay alive regardless of admin. And this aspect (of "some parts of the govt aren't really affected by the elected reps) isn't a new thing at all either - see: Yes (Prime) Minister. | |
| ▲ | brandon272 30 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37267299 (2023) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5192749 (2013) There have been discussions on HN about this topic across administrations. That is not to say that there aren’t differences in degree, but the government has long maintained that it has special rights to conduct searches at the border that would not be permitted elsewhere. | |
| ▲ | coldtea an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | >I really doubt the previous administration was trying to deprive people of their liberty based on their political beliefs Well, not for pro-themselves ones at least. | |
| ▲ | Stingertough an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | [flagged] |
|
|
| ▲ | etiennebausson 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Given that travel hadn't recovered from covid in 2022, that 45k to 55k increase mean even less. Has the % of people searched actually decreased? I don't trust the current U.S. gov (or any U.S. gov, really), but the figure isn't actually increasing in a significant way. The US. remain as unwelcoming to visitors as they have been since 2001. Nothing to see in this report. |
| |
| ▲ | strictnein an hour ago | parent [-] | | > The US. remain as unwelcoming to visitors as they have been since 2001 Strangely the stats don't back your assertion. Wouldn't being "unwelcoming since 2001" result in a decrease in travel? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tourism_in_the_United_States#V... | | |
| ▲ | y1n0 an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | I’d look for a change in slope. A permanent change that adversely affected tourism would decrease the slope, but maybe not so much as to make it negative. | | | |
| ▲ | jgwil2 an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | This is meaningless without a denominator. How much has international tourism increased in those years? What percentage of international tourists visited the US before and after 2001? | | |
| ▲ | strictnein an hour ago | parent [-] | | So it wasn't so bad that the number of people visiting the US decreased, but it was bad enough that it didn't increase as quickly as other places? Anyways, let's compare to more "welcoming" places. This shows the slope of the data, so it's pretty easy to compare the changes between countries. https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/international-tourist-tri... If you have data that shows otherwise, feel free to share it. |
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | y-curious an hour ago | parent | prev [-] |
| There is no recovering from this stat drop to the person you’re responding to. Well done. 45k pre trump is surprisingly high |
