| ▲ | aliljet an hour ago | |||||||
It's hard to not see this as a gut punch for OpenAI. They're lead was largely captured by scoring on value (by way of reset after reset) and now they're getting eaten up on price and being bestes and equalled on performance. I'll still pay a premium for Opus 5.5 right now because it's nearly unlimited use, but Google is the quiet sleeping king Everyone is happy to watch everyone else, but I'd wager google burns more tokens through their search product than basically anyone else and now they're just quietly pacing the frontier... | ||||||||
| ▲ | tomrod 41 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
They own their hardware. That vertical integration alone probably saves oodles because they can reconfigure to their needs as opposed to individually negotiating data centre plans. I can't imagine the complexity both OpenAI and Anthropic have to maintain for their deployments. | ||||||||
| ▲ | aleqs 35 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
> Opus 5.5 right now because it's nearly unlimited use Anthropic has some of the lowest usage per $ in general, not sure what you're taking about. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | zozbot234 36 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
It's not as smart as Claude Opus 5.5 High according to the AA benchmark. Looks like a big fat nothingburger so far, though it's possible that future fine-tuned checkpoints of the same pretrained model will do a lot better. | ||||||||