| ▲ | paimapi 2 hours ago | |||||||||||||
Bit of a sensationalist title - EEG/iEEG measurements have led to worthwhile clinical outcomes but also are an avenue for bunk pseudosccience so it pays to be careful whenever you see the words 'brain waves' paired with some large claim. More accurate, much less sexy title: Intracranial Recordings Uncover Spiral and Concentric Brain Waves During Memory Tasks" (study completed only on small cohorts of epilepsy patients performing constrained memory tasks). No inner workings revealed or laid bare, just another piece of evidence contributing to a small part of the debate in cortical electrophysiological studies on whether or not some data measures can be discarded as the downstream, messy noise of the neurons firing or actual, high-fidelity signals of activity | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | Animats an hour ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||
And still all slow stuff, 4 to 12 Hz. There must be something in the brain that clocks faster, but nobody seems to have found it yet. | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | plastic-enjoyer 35 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||
>also are an avenue for bunk pseudosccience so it pays to be careful whenever you see the words 'brain waves' paired with some large claim. What makes you make such an accusation? | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||