| ▲ | t-writescode 4 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
That.. looks like a normal sentence to me, and very probably one of the ones Microsoft required they add. Did you give the article a once-over beyond that? It’s one of the decidedly not-AI lines. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | 0x_rs 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
It's not a "normal" sentence and is quite clearly produced by an LLM, it's a typical Claudeism so probably that. The entire post is also flagged by Pangram, so OP is correct. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | ltbarcly3 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prefixing saying something with "Two quick notes first" is extremely common AI meta commentary. You may be right that it is something Microsoft insisted he put at the top, which would also explain the weird style. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||