Gemini is also pretty nice for researching things. It turns out that having the whole internet indexed and having unlimited access to YouTube is a force multiplier of some kind.

Since Google has their own TPUs, TPS is also pretty high w.r.t. Claude, for example.

▲

thunfischtoast an hour ago | parent | next [-]

I think Gemini could be a great product, if they didn't decide to stuff it down my throat at every possible occasion.

Recent example: on my e-reader, tapping a word I don't now and clicking "Translate" pulls up the possible translations from a dictionary, a local file just a couple of megabytes big, near instantly, on this tiny processor.

Doing the same on my Android phone starts a Gemini-chat with the prompt "Translate the word x into y". Takes forever, internet access needed, results vary, burns who knows who much energy.

Why? Just why?

	▲	bayindirh an hour ago \| parent \| next [-]
		That kind of shoving down is pretty bad, I agree. I neither use Android devices nor Google Search, so the only Gemini thing I see is the Gemini chat interface. I understand the pain, though.
	▲	selestify an hour ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		So that some team at Google can hit their OKRs for user adoption and get promoted.

▲

lxgr an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

Gemini is unbelievably bad for research in my experience. It hallucinates like it's 2023, doesn't use its own search, makes up fake rationalizations for why it didn't need to etc.

It's baffling that OpenAI managed to get better at web search than the company literally synonymous with web search.

	▲	bayindirh an hour ago \| parent [-]
		Pretty interesting. It one-shots correct information with references and a further reading list 99% of the time for me. I don't want it to fill in the gaps though, but make it reference anything and everything it brings, hence it doesn't hallucinate much. If something feels off, I ask it to back it with concrete data, and if it can't, I don't consider that information correct. That happened once, though, and web doesn't have any information on that thing either. So in that case, not only it had no information on the web, the training data had no information on that thing either short of feeding confidential design documents if they were ever present in the first place. The question was about an instrument preamp though, so nothing crucial.