| ▲ | yodon 3 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The SR-71 is cool, but this article is not at all confidence inspiring on many fronts. Guy being interviewed by a reporter about a secret project. A secret project that is trying to resurrect an antique plane that has been subject to weather and on display as a museum piece for many years. It sounds like a clown-show staged around a cool looking plane that's older than 90+% of HN readers. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | caidan 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
It’s almost certainly being done by clowns on the orders of one of the clowns in chief. Note that quote, “I would drop everything to work on that” said guy who did not in fact drop anything to work on that. Reading between the lines I can hear old Mr loaf belting out “I would do anything for love, but I won’t do that!” | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | somenameforme 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
There was something special about the 60s in the US. Your comment implies you might not appreciate how absurd the SR-71 was. The F-35 is our latest fighter jet. It has a top speed of 1200 mph, the SR-71 had a top speed of 2200 mph. The F-35 is capable of operating at around 50,000 ft, the SR-71 was capable of operating at 85,000 ft. The F-35 has a self fueled range of about 1350 miles, the SR-71 had a self fueled range of 2,900 miles. Look up aviation records and you'll find the SR-71. It even still holds the #1 spot for the fastest airflight (by a plane) ever. Basically, the SR-71 is old, but old doesn't mean antiquated. The 60s was the era that we went from knowing basically nothing about space, to putting a man on the Moon in 7 years (Kennedy gave his 'to the Moon' speech in 1962, first landing 1969), while we currently flail about trying to recreate it with a program lasting into the decades already. The SR-71 was another product of this era. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | eichin 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Back when the SR-71 was active, this magazine was nicknamed "Aviation Leak and Space Mythology" - them doing an article after the other rumours and Isaacman quotes reduces the credibility of the story, at least among Old Folk :-) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | pbk111 an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The guy interviewed is actually the gentleman that was in charge of destroying all the spare parts at the end of the SR-71 program So he knows what he is talking about and is well known. Old interview here: https://youtu.be/mQse_XLxcWM?is=JASvQNI_bVn_bAr7 The remaining members of the quickly dwindling Blackbird community ( maintainers and flight crews) are very skeptical that it can be done but it does not mean that Isaacman is not trying. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | ceejayoz 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> It sounds like a clown-show… Well, the President wants to redesign the Navy to look "cool" - battleships, carriers with steam catapults again and center islands. Why not the Air Force too? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | imglorp 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Clown show is my guess too. There's no utility for it other than rattling windows and other airshow shenanigans for bragging press releases. There are faster (X-43 is mach 9.6 but unmanned) and higher and stealthier ships. But unless you're going to dip into the classified catalog, a rusty SR-71 is faster than the next fastest two ships which are both MiGs. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | dboreham an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The story is almost certainly a leak. The amateur hour reporting can be ignored. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||