Yeah, and the trade-off here is that it takes time. In the same way, you can write insightful blog posts or work emails using AI if you maintain creative control, but all of sudden, you're not moving at 100x speed. You're moving a lot closer to human speed.

This trade-off is something I like the least about AI. In the time it takes someone to produce excellent results using AI without giving up control, people unconcerned with quality or style can produce 100x as much. So by the end of the day, your inbox or your social media feed is mostly slop.

▲

agilek 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

The fact it takes time is not a trade-off. It is an actual design work.

	▲	xgulfie 3 hours ago \| parent [-]
		You forget that in any given blog post, work is bad, unless it's the kind of work the blog author does, then it's valuable

▲

augment_me 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I mean, one part of the trade-off is that you can be a designer without having gone to design school. If you can use the tools you can iterate on the averageness of all these professions and fill all those shoes.

Choose 1:

A UX-designer with that outputs design with AI at the speed of a UX-designer without AI

A programmer that can output designs with AI at the same speed, and make your database, and make your helpdesk, and make your social media, booking systems, etc.

▲

hk1337 2 hours ago | parent [-]

AI can do an awesome job at UI and come up with really nice look but I feel like there’s a lot of psychology behind UX that AI cannot necessarily pick up on the human element.

	▲	augment_me an hour ago \| parent [-]
		Explain what cannot be picked up on and why. The LLMs have ingested courses and books on UI, UX, psychology, neuroscience, consumer neuroscience, etc. What makes it incapable of getting this information?