> “An Interdisciplinary Synthesis Across Economics, Psychology, Biology, Philosophy, Game Theory, and Spiritual Tradition.”

If one were inclined, they could shorten the title to "AI Synthesis Across Economics, Psychology, Biology, Philosophy, Game Theory, and Spiritual Tradition." Maybe that's an Easter egg.

AI submissions, soon AI reviewers, and shortly after only AI readers.

The guy's name is "nosloP" spelled backwards. Maybe spelled normally it's supposed to signify the opposite.

▲

jagged-chisel 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> The guy's name is "nosloP" spelled backwards. Maybe spelled normally it's supposed to signify the opposite.

Most insightful comment

	▲	mag7269 2 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Yeah, he should publish this exquisite finding in the Journal of Human Shit That AI Would Not Produce
	▲	chips_not_fries 18 minutes ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		He be Spool'n

▲

nico 34 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> AI submissions, soon AI reviewers, and shortly after only AI readers

This is already happening. Write code with an AI agent, agent creates PR, other agents review, coding agent iterates, PR gets merged, and hopefully real humans use the application and provide feedback

The latter step is also now staring to be replaced by AI (user directs agent to access app, get data, perform actions)

Similar thing with email

▲

EA-3167 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

https://www.pangram.com/history/51744f24-1896-4d5c-8bfc-786c...

It isn't even partially human written, it's just an LLM's output.

▲

ofjcihen an hour ago | parent [-]

As much as I’m confident this reasercher is just a skinsuit for a slop machine I don’t exactly trust pangram. I’ve apparently been flagged for possible AI slop comments based on Pangram results before.

Oddly it seems to have happened on longer posts? Don’t know if that may play a part.

▲

esperent an hour ago | parent | next [-]

Isn't pangram more accurate with longer texts? Does it claim to be accurate for comment sized text?

	▲	ofjcihen 29 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		[dead]

▲

EA-3167 35 minutes ago | parent | prev [-]

It certainly isn’t perfect, especially when it gives a probability below 100%z .

▲

locallost 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

That the name in no slop backwards is too wild to be real, but it's a real person.

I mean it's everywhere now. I complained already at my workplace multiple times, we get huge Claude generated documents, which people then ask Claude to summarize. I don't mind some of it in principle but people are too lazy now to input all the details so you get a bunch of fantasies that were explicitly ruled out already. It's tiring.

	▲	orwin an hour ago \| parent \| next [-]
		I went to a "town hall" at my company last friday, the slides were all obviously AI-generated, the text was too, without anybody proofreading it. How do i know? Because i doubt "Access&Identity will help us push forward the productivity of all collaborators" was what the team responsible for the prompt wanted to say.
	▲	superhuzza 33 minutes ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		He is most definitely a real person, I know people who have written papers with him.