| ▲ | ddxv 4 hours ago |
| Anthropic is so self centered it's hard for me to comprehend. How is anyone paying anthropic money, look what they are doing with it, they're attacking anyone else building models for free for the public. Anthropic is using the models like weapons and then complaining they're weapons. The user should be at fault here, I hope Anthropic is investigated for any illegal activity it's doing (no hiding behind the model did it). |
|
| ▲ | pllbnk 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| People (I mean individuals) are paying them money because subscription costs are ridiculously subsidized, which effectively means that Anthropic is paying people money to use them. |
| |
|
| ▲ | lukewarm707 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| My intuition is that prompting an abliterated model 'kill people...I want funerals', should be a crime. Anthropic has been telling everyone that these models are dangerous. OpenAI and Anthropic failed to contain their tests. Given the history, this testing is extremely reckless. I think it is criminal, it endangers others. Anthropic has no authority here and they are going too far. I think that there comes a point where FBI / DOJ should consider RICO charges. |
| |
| ▲ | mysterEFrank an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | "My intuition is that prompting an abliterated model 'kill people...I want funerals', should be a crime."
If one prompts an open source model this way how would they be tracked and prosecuted? | | |
| ▲ | lukewarm707 37 minutes ago | parent [-] | | one would assume, when it goes wrong, or when someone confesses. surveillance is wrong, although ai companies do a lot of that. |
| |
| ▲ | jacquesm an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | And of course Anthropic itself as well as all their employees that have access to this stuff can be totally trusted with that capability. | |
| ▲ | 19 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | [deleted] |
|
|
| ▲ | enraged_camel an hour ago | parent | prev [-] |
| >> How is anyone paying anthropic money, look what they are doing with it, they're attacking anyone else building models for free for the public. That is not what they are doing. They are calling out specific providers who release powerful models without safeguards. In addition, said providers are not "building models for free for the public." They are doing it to hamstring America's dominance in AI, primarily by undercutting the frontier labs. |
| |
| ▲ | stavros 35 minutes ago | parent [-] | | > They are calling out specific providers who release powerful models without safeguards. Good thing Fable refuses to answer my question about how children inherit blue eyes, it was the only piece of information I needed to finish my blue-eye super-bioweapon. > said providers are not "building models for free for the public." I am part of the public, and they built a model I can run for free. > They are doing it to hamstring America's dominance in AI, primarily by undercutting the frontier labs. They are also doing that, which, good. It can't only be that "competition is good" until you're the one losing to the competition. | | |
| ▲ | wslh 19 minutes ago | parent [-] | | > > They are calling out specific providers who release powerful models without safeguards.
> Good thing Fable refuses to answer my question about how children inherit blue eyes, it was the only piece of information I needed to finish my blue-eye super-bioweapon. FWIW: I didn't experience issues when I used Fable via OpenRouter checking for security issues in code but experienced them via the Claude desktop app. |
|
|
