new | show | ask | jobs Github

rolosa 5 hours ago

Muse is $0/$16/$80 vs Dot being $100/$200/$500 so yeah I don't think Dot is meant for casuals.

▲

LollipopYakuza 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Is it really about what it offers, or about how each plan are subsidized by Meta and OpenAI?

▲

5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

[deleted]

▲

abirch 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Meta is probably making money off of Muse. They can sell ads with the information that they glean.

▲

jstummbillig 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

While there are people around here that would still argue Anthropic/OpenAI tokens are "subsidized", I find it much more plausible that Muse tokens are, given Metas strategy of burning money, including on AI models, in hope of making something happen in a market they want to enter.

	▲	anthonypasq 4 hours ago \| parent [-]
		calling the tokens "subsidized" in a Muse subscription is incoherent. they arent selling the tokens. they are selling a product. the tokens are just part of the cost of making a product just like any other product in existence.

▲

vineyardmike 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

They’ve claimed they’re not using the data for ads… for now

	▲	espadrine an hour ago \| parent [-]
		There may be a reason that I cannot access it from the EU. There, they cannot repurpose data they swallowed for another use without consent.

▲

rheisen_ an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

[dead]

▲

ModernMech 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

It’s meant for rich casuals. If you watch the presentation, everyone they depicted using it seemed to be in some high paying which collar profession. I.e. it’s for people like the people who work at open ai.