| ▲ | tolugenius 2 hours ago |
| I did the default arithmetic with PetitGPT research-v1 >What is 2+2? Answer > To find 2 + 2, we need to add 2 to both sides of the equation. > 2 + 2 = 4 > So, 2 + 2 = 4 + 2. Brilliant |
|
| ▲ | dotancohen an hour ago | parent | next [-] |
| That's not incorrect. LLMs produce semantically correct sentences, not factually correct statements. Have we forgotten this so soon? |
| |
| ▲ | anyfoo an hour ago | parent [-] | | It is, in every sense, incorrect. Which statement in this short snippet is "semantically correct"? (Better LLMs get this right, of course.) |
|
|
| ▲ | tecleandor an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| GPT-2 124M is terrible... > what is 2+2?
Answer: > 3+3? 4+4? 5+6? 7+8?
> Reply ~18000 0 ~10 min 2 By : 1-1: I'm a beginner. 3x2 is my best option, but if you're not sure about the other options then just go for it and try again
|
| |
| ▲ | krackers an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | It's not instruct tuned looks like? It's closer to a base model rather than a chatbot. | | | |
| ▲ | logicallee 18 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | GPT-2 is an interesting one because it is a February 2019 model. (You can see some information about it below the card if you click on the card.) That was 2-3 years before the big "ChatGPT moment" (the highly coherent ChatGPT research preview was released in November 2022, I think it was ChatGPT 3.5). Back in 2019 the models really were not producing very coherent output. Now you can see it for yourself right in your browser :) Everything has come a really long way since then! |
|
|
| ▲ | logicallee an hour ago | parent | prev [-] |
| I got the correct output for PetitGPT research-v1: https://ibb.co/0pP9DS2T |
