"Sonnet 5.5’s cyber capabilities are a large improvement over Sonnet 5’s, so we’re deploying it with safeguards similar to those on Opus 5.5. Users can still find and fix bugs in their code as part of routine software development, but higher-risk cybersecurity tasks will visibly fall back to Sonnet 5

Sounds like at least for Anthropic models we reached peak cyber capabilities with Opus 4.8. Everything after that falls back to worse models

▲

ttul 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Daybreak Blue is not bad and the bar to get into OpenAI's program is reasonable.

▲

watusername an hour ago | parent [-]

Hold on, is there any bar to begin with? For OpenAI's Daybreak Blue, I only had to go through the Persona KYC to gain access. With Anthropic's I had to submit links to my profile and briefly describe my use cases, which I doubt were read by any human being but at least there's some semblance of barrier.

	▲	ttul 29 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		Yeah, I did say the bar is low :) Daybreak Blue is the not the same thing as Daybreak Red, which has a more significant hurdle. I don't know anyone who has gotten access to Red.

▲

gozzoo an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

what is the easyest way to use the chinese models and which harness does work with them well?

▲

beveradb 2 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

opencode with model inference on cheaperinference.com has been working well for me - glm-5.3-flash is shockingly cheap (i've spent a total of a few dollars over several weeks of heavy usage), fast and capable for cyber tasks

▲

Iolaum an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

OpenCode harness with their subscription would be my recommendation.

	▲	malshe 34 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		Between OpenCode and Openrouter which one would you suggest? Sometimes I have pure grunt work to be done on non-sensitive data for which I want to use Chinese models. For example, tasks like extracting something from publicly available large pdf files.