| ▲ | pookieinc an hour ago | |
It's interesting that in all their benchmarks, they omit Fable numbers and only focus on Opus, Sonnet, and OpenAI models. Maybe Fable is out the door? | ||
| ▲ | radial_symmetry an hour ago | parent | next [-] | |
Fable is no longer on the price/performance pareto frontier. They will probably release an updated Fable at some point that will be frontier intelligence until the next Opus. | ||
| ▲ | WinstonSmith84 an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
"Their" benchmarks (and not just Anthropic's) look sssooooo suspicious that they would probably manage to rank Sonnet above Fable for some of their tasks which would just be next level non-sense .. | ||
| ▲ | jrflo an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
Models are getting more efficient far faster than they are getting more intelligent at the moment. From a marketing angle it's more impressive to focus on that, and fable would look orders of magnitude more expensive for only marginal gain, distracting from what they're trying to show here | ||
| ▲ | lanthissa an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
cutting edge fable is for them not you and they're not going to share the metrics until they give you access. | ||
| ▲ | bpodgursky an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | |
Fable 5.5 probably drops soon so it would just be confusing. | ||