| ▲ | egillie 3 hours ago | |||||||
can we legally treat ai companies like parents of children? if a child drives a car into a storefront, the parent is responsible for the damage, and at some point you might even criminally charge the parent if there was gross negligence | ||||||||
| ▲ | cmiles8 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
The law already works like that. You can’t write some computer code and automation, set it loose, and then go “oops the computer did it.” It’s not a defense. While it may be hard to nail down which specific engineers to lock up, the corporation as a whole absolutely can be charged criminally. As Mitt Romney once said “corporations are people.” | ||||||||
| ▲ | andrewla 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
Hate to say it but I don't think you're right on the legalities even in the children's case. In the US anyway, in most jurisdictions [1], if the child's act was not malicious, then parental responsibility is not automatic, but is contingent on the result being foreseeable [2] by the parents. [1] Hawaii and Louisiana are strange in this regard. Some other states have a version of this but severely cap the amounts. [2] "foreseeable" here standing in for a broad set of legal standards that roughly map to negligence/gross negligence/recklessness on the part of the parent | ||||||||
| ||||||||