Frontier models are subjectively worse at this, in my experience. Very intelligent but very prone to expanding scope. I need to spend more time prompting to get good results. Maybe I'm just working on boring stuff that doesn't require "frontier" intelligence?

i have unlimited tokens and i throw Fable / Astra at everything. They suck ass still for anything nontrivial. I could commit that garbage but if I kept doing it, I will end up with a ball of mud only Fable / Astra can grok..convenient for Dario and SamA..

I've asked Codex with GPT 6 Astra to *review" a one time benchmarking script for any mistakes (built by Claude Code using Opus 5.5) and it refactored the shit out of it claiming all sorts of stuff without even asking about the context in which it was developed.

If I was to employ them to review the code without giving each the same baseline multi-page prompt, they go into endless loop of "improvement" with no end goal in sight.

More and more frequently, I instruct frontier models to stop and go back to the task at hand.

Where's the great software, then? I'm genuinely asking: where is it? Because I can't find it, and it's been close to a year since AI for programming has started to take off.

Tell me you never once bothered to look at the generated code without telling me you don't look at the generated code.

Luajit is under 80,000 lines of code.