| ▲ | bradly an hour ago | |
I've never been on either side of one of situations, but if the company is doing well, why doesn't the company just take care the human? These don't really seem like opening-the-flood-gates types of decisions that companies could just choose to do if they wanted to, right? | ||
| ▲ | brettgriffin 19 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | |
You don't see the risk that is created when you allow unexercised options get called at a later date, when they're in the money, because the company is 'doing well'? | ||
| ▲ | crossroadsguy 30 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
One of the reasons such companies do well is they don't entertain "such things". Sad. But that's besides the point. | ||
| ▲ | xyst 16 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | |
> why doesn't the company just take care the human? Taking care of the human is not good for cApiTaLisM | ||