Read papers given to you!

When someone dismisses your interpretation it serves to understand it well.

Additionally: A contractual mistake would likely not return specific performance (stock) unless special conditions were met.

For example: a company makes a stock mistake, you observe that at the time it happens, but then do nothing until you see the stock increase in value. Company could assert you _were_ due the stock but the value of that stock is determined by the time-of-breach and they return you $.

Unless you had a substantial claim to voting interest would probably be monetary reward!

NYL

▲

cheema33 39 minutes ago | parent [-]

> Read papers given to you!

I don't. I blame on the ADHD. Or maybe its laziness.

	▲	omgJustTest 12 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		it is laziness! and what is surprising is it saves a lot of grief if you read it. people will go to _amazing_ lengths not to read something new or unfamiliar. That feeling of "i must be dumb" is most often the reason people avoid it, and is just the normal part of learning something new.