| ▲ | andsoitis 7 hours ago | |||||||
> That's up to personal preference. Stated preference perhaps, but unlikely revealed preference. Depends on context, but for a computer on which you're doing work, moving wallpaper is usually a net negative for usability while you're actively working, though the magnitude depends heavily on the animation. The problem is primarily peripheral attention. Motions is a strong pre-attentive visual signal: your visual system detects it without you deliberately deciding to look at it. One a laptop where you're close to the display and spending long periods concentrating on text, code, documents, etc., any visible animated region around or through windows can create low-level competition for attention. A good compromise is wallpaper motion during transitions or stillness during work. Broader UI principle: motion should explain change, not create change to be noticed. | ||||||||
| ▲ | Razengan 7 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||
> on which you're doing work, moving wallpaper is usually a net negative for usability while you're actively working No, you don't know me, or other people. I want every fucking thing moving at all fucking times. It's okay. Btw for other people who love some motion in their occupation: | ||||||||
| ||||||||