| ▲ | hazard 8 hours ago | |
Pangram check on the article: 94% of this text is AI | ||
| ▲ | meander_water 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
I actually think this might be a false positive. I think it got tripped up by the higher than average use of jargon (which I don't mind here because the article itself flowed well and raised good points). Gpt-zero scores "human", and I've always found it to be a better judge | ||
| ▲ | singpolyma3 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
Pangram check on this comment: 142% of this text is AI | ||
| ▲ | blastingrock 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
it's really obvious too | ||