It happens with open source software all the time, why would we expect any different with open source weights.

reactordev 10 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Because we do. The GPL isn't a suggestion. If you can take open source code and make private software out of it then what are we all doing? No, license requirements and agreement are law for a reason.

	▲	bloggie 10 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Kimi K3 has its own license which is permissive, it isn't at all like GPL https://github.com/MoonshotAI/Kimi-K3/blob/main/LICENSE
	▲	dgellow 9 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		GPL is a specific license, it’s not FLOSS as a whole

▲

otterley 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Because the licenses that apply to software make no sense in the context of LLMs. With the latter, there is no source code to license.

The words of a license are what the license is.