| ▲ | kebman a day ago | |
From Cambridge Dictionary: ```markdown abhorrent /əbˈhɒr(ə)nt/ Abhorrent is an adjective that means morally very bad, hateful, or causing strong disgust and loathing. ``` I realise that this causes strong disgust and loathing in you, but can you please expand upon how it's morally very bad to prioritise speed and ease of use over undelete capability in Neovim? Are you unable to make backups or use Git? | ||
| ▲ | overfeed a day ago | parent [-] | |
You are presenting a false dilemma: Neovim could have easily done both without the deletion. Willful negligence is morally very bad when it can cause user harm. > Are you unable to make backups or use Git? Ah yes, the old perty theft justification as applied to intentionally-inflicted data loss; "They won't mind if I take/delete this, they (should) have insurance". | ||